An archive of boards.dungeonrunners.com (2006–2010), recovered from the Wayback Machine.
| Main Index · Search · Members |
| General Discussion » Lower Levels (25 and below) Read | View all threads |
| 9 of 19 known posts were recovered with their text; the rest are shown as placeholders. | |
|
KingofCarnage Rabbit Puncher |
Lower Levels (25 and below) Read
#66951 - 07/10/08 11:03 AM |
[content not captured by the Wayback Machine — post known from thread listings only] |
|
Ripper_McGee Dungeon Walker |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read
#66957 - 07/10/08 11:15 AM |
[content not captured by the Wayback Machine — post known from thread listings only] |
|
Bogey Veteran |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read [Re: #66957]
#66965 - 07/10/08 11:25 AM |
[content not captured by the Wayback Machine — post known from thread listings only] |
|
KingofCarnage Rabbit Puncher |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read [Re: #66965]
#66973 - 07/10/08 11:55 AM |
[content not captured by the Wayback Machine — post known from thread listings only] |
|
Anson Actual Hawk |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read [Re: #66973]
#66977 - 07/10/08 12:19 PM |
[content not captured by the Wayback Machine — post known from thread listings only] |
|
Legendrunner Dungeon Walker |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read [Re: #66977]
#66995 - 07/10/08 01:21 PM |
[content not captured by the Wayback Machine — post known from thread listings only] |
|
evilpimp New Kid |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read [Re: #66965]
#66997 - 07/10/08 01:29 PM |
[content not captured by the Wayback Machine — post known from thread listings only] |
|
Talmorr Chicken Hawk |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read [Re: #66997]
#66999 - 07/10/08 01:38 PM |
[content not captured by the Wayback Machine — post known from thread listings only] |
|
Ripper_McGee Dungeon Walker |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read [Re: #66997]
#67001 - 07/10/08 01:39 PM |
[content not captured by the Wayback Machine — post known from thread listings only] |
|
Khazandra Veternarian |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read [Re: #67001]
#67009 - 07/10/08 02:31 PM |
[content not captured by the Wayback Machine — post known from thread listings only] |
|
chazz Chicken Hawk Posts: 158 |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read [Re: #67009]
#67107 - 07/11/08 02:48 AM |
Ahhh happy day, I can never be bothered with a pl request again  (or give me rb's, or how did you get so tall?, or can I have some spare gold, or.......) |
|
SgtSlaughter Armchair Warrior Posts: 28 |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read [Re: #67107]
#67121 - 07/11/08 06:39 AM |
Quote: It does get rather old, doesn't it? -------------------- - Sarge I saw God cry in the reflection of my enemies |
|
KingofCarnage Rabbit Puncher Posts: 54 |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read [Re: #67121]
#67125 - 07/11/08 07:58 AM |
The tall thing I never did understand. A majority of people I have met wear them because they "look cool" why not spare thelooks and get stuff that can actually benefit you. And I assume a couple of you are level 100, more powewr to ya. Im only 72 and Im already sick of it. |
|
LordMagnus Veteran Posts: 1,033 |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read [Re: #67125]
#67127 - 07/11/08 08:17 AM |
There are growth-items which benefit you in many ways, others not so much. I've used builds where rings who happen to have +Character Size is the best for me, other builds where I use other rings. It's also fun running around with full growth just to look cool. It's a status-thing.  -------------------- May The Rainbows Drop As Cows From The Sky HDoL.eu - Horrific Domain of Legend - A Dungeon Runners Fansite |
|
Legendrunner Fully Decked out Skittle Posts: 1,609 |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read [Re: #67125]
#67129 - 07/11/08 08:26 AM |
And your range to the obelisk and NPC's is bigger, too. You can get the obelisks creen right away, and get to audrey a bit faster. Its still a benefit, tho it is considered as a bug by the devs, I believe. It is also handy to get 53% as 100 when you need to trade with someone, easy to find. |
|
Bogey Veteran Posts: 738 |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read [Re: #67129]
#67131 - 07/11/08 08:35 AM |
|
Tingus_Nequam Actual Hawk Posts: 249 |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read [Re: #67125]
#67219 - 07/11/08 02:49 PM |
Quote: With my first toon, I felt the same. I couldn't imagine sacrificing utility for aesthetics, so I walked around using only the most utilitarian items I could find -- but mostly looked like a clashing, mismatched goober for 75 levels or so. (I do enough of that in RL, so...) With the new toon, I now realize that an extra point here or there doesn't do too much, so I'm more reluctant to give up an old cool looking/growth rb in favor of a new purp that might mean I drink one less pot in a level. |
|
AlienEighter Veteran Posts: 879 |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read [Re: #67219]
#67255 - 07/11/08 04:29 PM |
There used to not be many growth items that were useful to rangers, so wearing growth, for me too, was just for "showing off" around town. But since the devs added more variety to the items, I have some very helpful growth items, like a couple of fab finger girdles that boost my endurance and give +4% ranged damage. |
|
xorekle Chicken Hawk Posts: 149 |
Re: Lower Levels (25 and below) Read [Re: #67255]
#67497 - 07/12/08 10:49 PM |
sad thing is if those lower lvls just lvled up a few more lvls and learned how to AoE as a mage. They could basically PL themselves. |
| All times are US Eastern, the board's original clock (vBulletin-era times converted from GMT). |