| Main Index · Search · Members |
| Suggestions » Difficulty | View all threads |
| 10 of 11 known posts were recovered with their text; the rest are shown as placeholders. | |
|
Sanction New Kid Posts: 2 |
Difficulty
#40741 - 12/11/07 11:40 AM |
What were the Devs thinking? I am NOT (repeat NOT!) 'entertained' by the new difficulties for Ember and up. For that matter, the entire world! I guess I was under the mistaken impression that THAT was what the DIFFICULTY SETTING was for. NORMAL SHOULD be FUN, with a SLIGHT challenge...NOT a Potion-Sucking-trip-into-Drudgery! If high level people were [censored] about the 'easiness' then Ramp Up the percentages for HIGHER Diff's NOT NORMAL. |
|
Legendrunner Veteran Posts: 702 |
Re: Difficulty
#40758 - 12/11/07 12:34 PM |
Sanction, cool down. I cannot say much about it as I always use much pots due to I always run insane abby on 100 difficulty. Still I can say loads and loads of players wanted more challange. Well there it is, and what the devs get? This kind of angry threads. Bringing your problem/suggestion on another way would be far more reasonable, would get better reactions and above all, would be taken serious. -------------------- LegendRunner - level 100 Ace something The Townstons Wiki Archive! - Boss of TT Dont Feed The Trolls! (Avatar) "I've become stoned by the pots, dont mind me." - Famous Quote |
|
Elkie Armchair Warrior Posts: 31 |
Re: Difficulty [Re: #40758]
#40763 - 12/11/07 12:40 PM |
I like it! Before I could walk through level after level and only ever drop potions during boss-fights. This was a welcome and enjoyable change for me. (but I'm not nearly as high a level, so who knows how much it changed in that area...) |
|
Itchy Chicken Hawk Posts: 168 |
Re: Difficulty [Re: #40763]
#40775 - 12/11/07 01:29 PM |
Quote: he has a point though. maybe we need a new easy setting with a 25% loot penalty? |
|
Stephen Big Boss Man Posts: 744 |
Re: Difficulty [Re: #40775]
#40801 - 12/11/07 04:37 PM |
Good idea on the "Easy" ![]() steve |
|
NoPantsNoProblem Armchair Warrior Posts: 27 |
Re: Difficulty [Re: #40801]
#40813 - 12/11/07 07:05 PM |
I think "easy" would be too heavy on the exp. The only reason anyone goes on normal is for powerleveling, giving barely a thought to loot. -------------------- "I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -Douglas Adams Hasabuckit- 27 Shadow Wizard NoPantsNoProblem- 9 Ranger ILikeTurtles- 4 Fighter |
|
Sanction New Kid Posts: 2 |
Re: Difficulty [Re: #40758]
#40815 - 12/11/07 07:18 PM |
Re: LR's Bringing your problem/suggestion on another way would be far more reasonable, would get better reactions and above all, would be taken serious. 1) I'm new to forums (in general) because... 2) I am never sure exactly what/where/how to use them and... 3) I was just too damn P.O.ed about my favorite game almost going into the toilet. The new rampings ruined the FUN of the game. RE: the EASY w/-%25 setting Fine. I have no shame about playing EASY, but it bugs me that the Devs messed with, what I call, a perfect mix. If I want a challenge, then I set it to something higher. On Second thought, NO! Normal was just fine until they messed with it. If people think that Insane is not hard enough, then add an IMPOSSIBLE layer to it. Why mess with ALL players just to satisfy the ones who like it hard? RE: Other thoughts that are bugging me: As it stands now, the only Fun left is playing my Mage. Fighters are too in-your-face when it comes to being swarmed by all those (self-censored) little-creeps. Rangers are, by name, SUPPOSED to be RANGED...One thwack at a monster and the whole group starts looking thru your pockets to find a place to camp. They should not ALL automatically know where the shot came from. That's all for now. {Signature should be...Don't get me started} |
|
DracMorair7 Chicken Hawk Posts: 186 |
Re: Difficulty [Re: #40815]
#40828 - 12/11/07 08:26 PM |
Ever ask why the devs did what they did... I'll say it again because apparently the new kids didn't get it the first time. This is "multi"player game... all gripes can be handled with just 2 or more people. If you want a solo player game go back to Diablo because.. FYI difficulty is for groups. Was that harsh? I think it was.. but its was anything but insulting... take these truths in the spirit in they were given and quit deleting my bloody post. -------------------- --- Rather respond to the ideas to reshape them or dissolve them with better ones. pLEASE? Thanks, DracMorair Click Me for My Forum Post on my build and its progress. |
|
Kalero New Kid Posts: 6 |
Re: Difficulty [Re: #40828]
#40842 - 12/11/07 11:21 PM |
Wow Drac. Completely different reason than Stephen actually gave for making that change. Might be why your posts get deleted? I like the Easy setting idea too. I dont build the best chars in the world so this patch hit me up pretty bad too. I probably could do a lot better making chars but mine are geared more for fun than uberness. IMO if your not having fun than your kinda wasting your time. |
|
Ripper_McGee Dungeon Walker Posts: 1,606 |
Re: Difficulty [Re: #40828]
#40847 - 12/12/07 12:08 AM |
Quote: Drac, you completely miss the point. The majority of complaints aren't about the difficulty settings (normal - insane), but are about the overall increase in game difficulty, especially at the higher levels. Many players are unhappy with the increased difficulty in normal mode. Regardless of your opinion on multi-player gaming, this game is designed for both solo and grouped play. As such, your comments and opinions to the contrary are completely inappropriate. -------------------- /twitch (TM) |
| unknown |
#41738 - date unknown |
[content not captured by the Wayback Machine — post known from thread listings only] |
| All times are US Eastern, the board's original clock (vBulletin-era times converted from GMT). |